Dec 21, 2023

Navigating Post-Divorce Challenges: Is Cohabitation Grounds For Terminating Maintenance Obligations?

Unraveling the Complexities of Post-Divorce MaintenanceDivorce is undoubtedly a challenging process, and life post-divorce brings its own set of hurdles. Imagine a scenario where, after seven years of faithfully fulfilling maintenance payments, your former client discovers that his ex-wife has been in a committed relationship for over three years. A common question arises: Can he terminate his maintenance obligation based on her cohabitation? Let’s explore the legal nuances surrounding this issue and discuss practical steps for those navigating similar situations.The Legal Landscape: Section 510(c) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage ActThe foundation for understanding maintenance termination based on cohabitation lies in Section 510(c) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. This statute states that maintenance obligations can be terminated if the party receiving maintenance cohabits with another person on a resident, continuing conjugal basis.The Murky Waters of Cohabitation CasesUnfortunately, the road to terminating maintenance based on cohabitation is not straightforward. The law in this area leaves much room for interpretation, with case law providing some factors to determine the existence of cohabitation. However, these factors can be murky and vary from case to case.Navigating the Evidence Collection ProcessFor those considering this path, collecting evidence becomes crucial. Advising your client, you recommend looking into various aspects of their ex-spouse's life, such as vacations, shared holidays, attendance at events, social media presence, and financial entanglements. In extreme cases, hiring a private detective might be necessary to confirm overnight stays and the frequency of the couple's interactions.The Pitfalls of Investigating CohabitationHowever, you caution your client that individuals have become savvy about avoiding termination of maintenance. They may go to great lengths to conceal the true extent of their relationship. You emphasize that despite diligent investigation, there's no guarantee that a judge will find cohabitation.Proposal for a Bright-Line RuleIn light of the challenges posed by the current legal framework, the idea of establishing a bright-line rule gains traction. A rule stating that if two people are in a committed relationship for a specified period—perhaps four years—it is presumed they are cohabitating could simplify the process. This would eliminate the need for extensive investigations and provide a realistic timeline for when maintenance could cease.Navigating the Complexities with Informed Decision-MakingIn the realm of post-divorce challenges, the question of terminating maintenance based on cohabitation adds another layer of complexity. As legal practitioners, it's essential to guide clients through the intricacies of the law while acknowledging its limitations. Whether advising on evidence collection or contemplating a bright-line rule, the goal is to empower clients to make informed decisions while navigating the grey areas of post-divorce life.

News and Insights

Jun 11, 2024

How Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance

Everyone loves a June wedding! When people ask a couple on the brink of their vows how ...
May 20, 2024

Kimberly Cook Returns to Schiller DuCanto & Fleck To Further Expand The Firm's Footprint in Alternative Dispute Resolution

Schiller, DuCanto & Fleck is excited to welcome home Kimberly A. Cook, who is ...
May 14, 2024

Adam Zebelian Reflects on LAGBAC and Its Role in Advancing LGBTQ+ Rights

Recently, partner Adam Zebelian (president of Chicago’s LGBTQ+ Bar Association), wrote an ...

Looking for a firm that knows Family Law, inside and out? We're ready to listen.